I used to get annoyed when I used to watch international channels in Nepal that they spelled Kathmandu as KATMANDU. I never understood the logic behind it but then I realised that it was Kathmandu’s English name. I was like, seriously!! Why do places in Nepal need English names? A name is a piece of identity, so no matter how hard the name is to pronounce, the place should be called by its original name, not a fake, easily-pronounced one. Most of the time, these names have their own history and meaning behind them so we are ruining it by changing it.
During my holiday, I realised it is not just Kathamndu that has its name changed; I saw the same thing in so many places in Europe and the Middle East also.
Some examples:
|
Original Name |
English Name |
|
Wien |
Vienna |
|
Milano |
Milan |
|
Torino |
Turin |
|
Firenze |
Florence |
|
Roma |
Rome |
|
Napoli |
Naples |
|
Brussels |
Brussel |
|
Italia |
Italy |
|
Roosendaal |
Rosendale |
|
al-Yaman Pekino |
Yemen Beijing |
These names are not even hard to pronounce as ‘Wien’ is no more of a tongue twister in English than cities called by their original names like ‘Lyon’ or ‘Zurich’. The pronunciation of the original name sounds as good or even better. I am sure people living there love the original name so why change for tourists.
I am not sure how many of you agree with me but for me a place should have only one name and that is its original name. Even though it might be hard to pronounce but it is its name and everyone needs to learn how to say it. Whoever got the idea of giving English names to every place, you are making this world boring. Why not just spend more time in teaching others how to pronounce the actual name instead of confusing others with two names?
What are your thoughts? Do you agree with me?
You may also like:
| *Burano : Italy | *Venice by night and Venetian dinner: Italy | *Buying fake designer bags can get you arrested in Italy |
nepaliaustralian 